DUI and Drink Driving Offences

Drink driving charges are considered serious charges and may implicate you in different ways based on the nature of the offence. If you have been charged with drink driving, one of the following conditions may apply to you:

Drink driving: Section 79(1)- No prior charge

Section 79 of the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act Queensland states that any person under the influence of alcohol or drug when drives a motor vehicle, tram, train or vessel, attempts to put in motion a motor vehicle, tram, train or vessel, is in charge of a motor vehicle, tram, train or vessel is guilty of drink or drug driving. This charge may attract the following penalties:

  • A maximum fine of 28 penalty units (1 unit is $100) or 9-months imprisonment.
  • Licence disqualification for a minimum of 6 months unless an alternative order is made by the Magistrate. The maximum penalty may be at the discretion of the Magistrate.
  • No right to apply for a work licence or Special Hardship Order .

Drink driving: Section 79(1) – One prior conviction arising from motor vehicle

If the offender has previously been convicted of a drink driving offence (within 5 years) that was connected to driving a motor vehicle, the following penalties may be applicable:

  • A maximum fine of 60 penalty units (1 unit is $100) or 18-months imprisonment.
  • Licence disqualification for a minimum of 1 year unless an alternative order is made by the Magistrate. The maximum penalty may be at the discretion of the Magistrate.
  • No entitlement to apply for a work licence or Special Hardship Order.

Drink driving: Section 79(1) – Two prior convictions

If the offender has been convicted twice previously (within 5 years before conviction), the following penalties may be applicable:

  • Imprisonment (part of or whole punishment) at Magistrate’s discretion.
  • Licence disqualification for a minimum of 2 years unless an alternative order is made by the Magistrate. The maximum period of licence disqualification may be at the discretion of the Magistrate.
  • No entitlement to apply for a work licence or Special Hardship Order.

Drink driving: Section 79(1) – Two prior convictions arising from motor vehicle

If the offender has been convicted twice previously (within 5 years), the following penalties may be applicable:

  • Imprisonment (part of or whole punishment) at Magistrate’s discretion.
  • Licence disqualification for a minimum of 2 years unless an alternative order is made by the Magistrate. The maximum period of licence disqualification may be at the discretion of the Magistrate.
  • No entitlement to apply for a work licence or Special Hardship Order.

More information on DUI and drink driving charges

If you have been charged with a drink driving offence, try to seek advice from an expert DUI lawyer, as it might help you to decide the course of action you should take. Experienced DUI lawyers will also provide you with advice that comes from years of experience of handling similar cases, guide you through the implications that your offence may have and will help you in getting a fair penalty or acquittal based on your circumstances.

Table of Contents

Don’t Stop Here

More To Explore

Driver using phone in traffic

Traffic Laws and Road Rules Commonly Broken

How good of a driver are you really – are you really familiar with all of the traffic laws and road rules? The Queensland Police Service have revealed that a driver refresher test shows that many of us either do not know the rules, or simply are not following them correctly. Here are some of

Speeding Fines QLD

If your vehicle has been detected speeding by a speed camera, you will receive an infringement notice asking you to either pay a fine in 28 days, attend court or nominate a driver. If the vehicle is registered under two people, the person whose name appears first will receive the notice as the operator of

Drink Driving Paramedic QLD

A QLD paramedic, based in Mackay, that was busted drink driving claimed in court that the Queensland Ambulance Service refused to support her application for a restricted work licence by issuing an affidavit “because it doesn’t look good for the service”. It was heard in court that Zara Renee Tuffin was almost twice the legal